M HKA gaat digitaal

Met M HKA Ensembles zetten we onze eerste échte stappen in het digitale landschap. Ons doel is met behulp van nieuwe media de kunstwerken nog beter te kaderen dan we tot nu toe hebben kunnen doen.

We geven momenteel prioriteit aan smartphones en tablets, m.a.w. de in-museum-ervaring. Maar we zijn evenzeer hard aan het werk aan een veelzijdige desktop-versie. Tot het zover is vind je hier deze tussenversie.

M HKA goes digital

Embracing the possibilities of new media, M HKA is making a particular effort to share its knowledge and give art the framework it deserves.

We are currently focusing on the experience in the museum with this application for smartphones and tablets. In the future this will also lead to a versatile desktop version, which is now still in its construction phase.

Ensemble: AMBIGUITY

The philosophical undercurrent to our investigations in Monoculture – A Recent History comes via the notion of ‘ambiguity’. In particular, this is through the pioneering, and under-recognised work of the Polish-Austrian psychoanalyst Else Frenkel-Brunswik.

 In 1950, a group of scientists from the University of California, Berkeley – a philosopher/sociologist and three psychologists: Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson and R. Nevitt Sanford – published The Authoritarian Personality. They sought an answer to the question of how the destructive ideologies responsible for the atrocities of the Second World War had managed to attract such a huge mass of followers. In her article ‘Personality theory and Perception’ Else Frenkel-Brunswik further elaborates the concept of  'ambiguity intolerance’. With this complex and versatile theory, she examines the connection between the ability to deal with an ambiguous visual language and tolerance for ambiguity in the world, the other and oneself. Ambiguity here, might for example be another person of ambiguous race, gender or sexuality, but could also be with other encounters such as with objects and sensorial experiences. In ‘Environmental Controls and the Impoverishment of Thought’, Frenkel-Brunswik takes a closer look at anti-intellectual tendencies and the attitude towards science in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

Until Immanuel Kant, Western philosophy mainly tried to eliminate ambiguity. Philosophers such as Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger and Simone de Beauvoir have rejected the ideal of this unequivocalness, which still lives on in the natural sciences. Today, ambiguity is a key concept for philosophers, social scientists, writers, and artists who oppose unequivocal interpretations of reality, understanding that to be human is also to be fundamentally ambiguous or unresolved. 

We are putting art in this category, understanding that art can be fundamentally ambiguous, not only aesthetically, but also ontologically – in terms of the nature of its existence in society. In this sense, art is also a reflection of the ambiguity of the human condition. With the inclusion of ambiguity, artistically and philosophically-speaking, in this exhibition, we also wish to look at what practices, values, and ways of living or perceiving might be excluded by the formation of monocultures of all kinds.

Alongside the examples of philosophical thought, this part of the exhibition included the works of Carol Rama, Hüseyin Bahri Alptekin, and Nicole

Hide this description

Themes & Categories

>MONOCULTURE – E. Frenkel-Brunswik.

Works

>Friederich Nietzsche, Friedrich Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Zur Genealogie der Moral, 1896.Book, 3,2 x 16 x 23,3 cm.

>Sigmund Freud, Massenpsychologie und Ich - Analyse, 1921.Book, 21 x 14,5 cm.

>Wilhelm Worringer, Abstraktion und Einfühlung. Ein Beitrag zur Stilpsychologie, 1921.Book, 21,5 x 14 x 1,5 cm.

>Hans Prinzhorn, Bildnerei der Geisteskranken: ein Beitrag zur Psychologie und Psychopathologie der Gestaltung, 1923.Book.

>Friederich Nietzsche, Friedrich Nietzsche, Die Geburt der Tragödie aus dem Geiste der Musik, 1930.Book, 15,5 x 10,3 cm.

>Carol Rama, Teatrino N. 2, 1937.Drawing, watercolour on paper, 13.8 x 23 cm.

>Carol Rama, Appassionata (Corso Francia 179 1930-1931), 1939.Drawing, watercolour on paper, 29 x 23 cm.

>Carol Rama, Le Palette (brevetto n. 7689R), 1940.Painting, watercolour on paper, 14 x 26 cm.

>Carol Rama, Appassionata (I due pini), 1940.Painting, watercolour on paper, 33,5 x 24 cm .

>Carol Rama, Appassionata, 1941.Drawing, watercolour on paper, 18.5 x 23.6 cm.

>Carol Rama, Proibito, 1944.Drawing, watercolour on paper, 10.5 x 14 cm.

>Carol Rama, Dorina, 1944.Drawing, watercolour on paper, 9.5 x 25 cm.

>Simone de Beauvoir, Pour une Morale de l'Ambiguïté, 1947.Book, 18.5 x 12 cm.

>Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J.Levinson, "The Authoritarian Personality", 1950.Book, 16,3 x 24 x 4,5 cm.

>Karl R. Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies, 1950.Book, paper, ink, 16 x 24 x 5 cm.

>Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Personality Theory and Perception, 1951.Book, 15,5 x 22,8 x 3,5 cm.

>Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951.Book, paper, ink, 24.2 x 16 x 3.3 cm.

>Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Environmental Controls and the Impoverishment of Thought, 1954.Book, 14,7 x 21,5 x 3 cm.

>Karl R. Popper, The Poverty of Historicism, 1957.Book, paper, ink, 22 x 14.2 x 2.1 cm.

>Nicole , Untitled, 1960.Drawing, paint on canvas.

>Julia Kristeva, Pouvoirs de l’Horreur. Essai sur l’Abjection, 1980.Book, 14 x 20,5 x 1,7 cm.

>Hüseyin Bahri Alptekin, Global Digestion , 1980-2007.Print, digital prints mounted on forex, 145 x 935 cm (installation sizes), 9,5 x 15 cm (each).

>Carol Rama, Marta La Cagona.Painting, watercolour on paper, 24 x 18 cm.